|
Whom Will I Send? A VISION FOR SERVING ASIA’S URBAN POOR Reference: Grigg, V. (2004). Companion to the Poor. GA, USA: Authentic Media in partnership with World Vision. Verses from Ecclesiastes came to mind one evening when I was back in New Zealand.
There was a little city with a few
men in it;
and his words are not heeded Battered by reverse culture shock, by illness, and by the rejection of friends, I was wandering down a bush track in the evening light. As I prayed, God brought a picture to my mind; a brilliant picture, in a manner I’ve come to recognize as from God. He showed me a hundred “poor, wise” men and women wandering the byways of the slums, dwelling among the poor of ten great cities in Asia—men and women who would, as Wesley says, “fear nothing but God and hate nothing but sin.”
A few days later, an artist living
up the road dropped me a note with a message the Lord had given her. It spoke of
the same call to establish a new movement. But the Lord continued to encourage me. I decided not to visit the influential people, but to start where I was, take what I had, and do what I could. I visited some friends. As I began to speak of the need in the slums, the Spirit of God was evident in unusual ways. Wherever I went, I found renewal—renewal that would break out when proud Christian leaders had humbled themselves before God. People would take me to meet these leaders. Most would listen humbly to this unknown missionary, and then confirm that indeed this was God’s voice and that he would rise up this work. God had already spoken to many others about the poor of Asia’s cities. He had prepared the way, and a new missionary movement began. Wanted: rugged laborers My message to these churches was simple. God’s method is people!
Do we not hear a call to go as
servants of that rugged cross, laborers whose delight is work, sacrifice and
suffering, whose souls are filled with compassion, and whose lifestyle is that
of simple poverty?
These bands can include people at
different life stages or of different marital status, but primarily include men
and women who deliberately choose singleness for a period, couples without
children, or couples whose children have grown up. Together they will form
“cells” or “communities” of six to ten workers to go to each of these great
cities. We need men and women willing to commit themselves to this task initially for six years—this being long enough to establish a first churches — but with the intention of spending fifteen to twenty years in the urban community to establish a discipling movement.
It is not unreasonable for a young
person to trust that God will bring fruit during these fifteen to twenty
years. Is it a big enough request to ask God for 1500 new Christians—or 3,000
or 15,000? A harvest like that would be a worthy lifetime’s work. Many have seen
God do this elsewhere.
Younger couples may need to delay
having children until they have had time to establish themselves in these slum
communities, know how to cope with poverty, drunkenness, the food, the climate,
hatred, and learn how to raise children in such an environment. The apostle Peter was such a man. He walked in a poor man’s wooden sandals (Acts 12:8) and had no gold for the beggar at the Temple (Acts 3:6). Similarly, the apostle Paul underwent stoning, beatings and shipwrecks, living “as poor, yet making many rich” in his desire to reach the cities of his world. Stories are told of Toribio, who traveled barefoot through Mexico. Other Mexicans called him “the poor one” because he was evidently poorer than they were. He learned the Aztec language quickly and preached fluently in that language. The Indians loved him like a father and regarded him almost like a divine Inca because of his total commitment and absolute poverty. He covered 40,000 miles on foot. He had nothing of his own to leave behind when he died. Above all, we need to remember the Master, who calls us to walk in his sandaled footsteps. He chose poverty in birth, poverty in life and finally, blood dripping from thorn-crowned brow, chose poverty on the cross of a criminal. Who will go? Who will take up the cross and follow him? Who will give fifteen or twenty years for the poorest of the people in the slums of Asia? Who will live among them, love them, and show them the King? Is this such an unreasonable request from the Lord who gave his all? Renewal As I visited churches calling for these “rugged laborers,” God was going before me, bringing renewal.
There seemed to be four phases of
renewal. The first was a phase of brokenness, humbling, repentance, restitution
and seeking the Lord. In this phase, God broke into people’s lives in a new way
with power, resulting in worship, evangelism, and the exercise of spiritual
gifts. Four or five years after renewal of an older church or the birth of a new fellowship, a third phase emerged. Scores of people developed an eagerness to be involved in missions. Hundreds upon hundreds volunteered for the field.
My role was to walk
behind the movement, sensing what God was doing, and providing a structure
to facilitate these missions thrust. We formed a new mission structure
called “Urban Leadership Foundation” to accommodate the people who wanted to
serve Asia’s urban poor No unemployment The vision I had seen called for a hundred laborers. A hundred laborers means a hundred church-planters—people who can pioneer new fellowships in unreached areas. Such a task requires all the social, intellectual, and spiritual capacities a person has. No lifestyle can match the thrill of church-planting. None demands so much from a person. Renewal alone will not produce such men and women. It takes eight or nine years of mature training in a dynamic church situation to produce a leader ready to serve in Asia. If we would develop long-term cross-cultural missionaries, the critical element is an apprenticeship relationship. Elisha, apprentice to Elijah, received a double portion of Elijah’s spirit. Joshua, forty years’ servant of Moses, led the people into Israel. Paul could say of Timothy: “I have no one else like him, who is genuinely interested in your welfare.” In the past, training has been a unique contribution of a number of para-church organizations in the body of Christ. Churches need encouragement to develop this apprenticeship model of training laborers. As God called more men and women to work among the poor, I would sit down with the pastor and elders of a church and discuss with them principles and phases of training potential laborers. Pastors were excited to see a new pattern of ministry opening up before them. Theologically, they had moved to a commitment to training. They appreciated practical input that helped them implement this new theology. In response, I adapted a “Focus Chart” that had been developed by Gene Tabor. My version came to be known as “The Four Seasons of Christian Training.” Rather than giving an entire program of training as most groups do, this model gives training principles to use during the four commonly identifiable stages of growth of a potential worker. Pastors and elders would spend considerable time enthusiastically discussing what stages they were in and what the next steps of growth should be. The first phase is a healthy Christian “babyhood” in a warm, relational, celebrating home-group and church fellowship. Most growing churches had become skilled in providing this. The second phase requires more personal discipling of the person by an elder or house group leader in the context of ministering to a small group of other believers. The third phase is the involvement of disciples in ministry to others as part of the church’s ministry team—as house-group leaders, youth leaders, part of the counseling or outreach team, and so on. Even the leader of a nursery can use this role to disciple young mothers. During this phase of ministry, the critical element is development of character. Potential leaders need to meet at least fortnightly to minister to one another at the personal level, relating scriptural teaching to the problems or matters that have emerged during the past fortnight.
The fourth phase of training
focuses on developing gifts and calling. It can involve a semi-independent
ministry: establishing a church or pioneering a new ministry thrust. Robin and his merry men
There is another kind of laborer
in the Scriptures—men and women skilled as deacons and deaconesses. We not only
need the apostle, the pastor-teacher, and the evangelist; we need men and women
filled with the Holy Spirit and with wisdom—men and women skilled in using money
given by the rich to meet the needs of the poor. (The early deacons’ biggest
responsibility was not giving out hymnals at the door!) In Ecclesiastes, the poor man who saved the city was wise. The wisdom needed to minister in the slums is not primarily learned in school. Christ imparted his wisdom in the context of loving action. His type of wisdom has to do with character, decision-making, ethical issues, and relationships. Yet godly wisdom is not only acquired “on the street.” As Solomon adds, wisdom is based on “getting knowledge, getting understanding.” It has an intellectual component. The urban mission field needs men and women of the finest academic training. The cultural understanding needed to mobilize a movement comes from the finest training in language learning, cross-cultural missions’ theory, and church history. Community development and church growth principles must be mastered if the kingdom will be established in a community. The complexity of issues is unending. We must upgrade our schools to provide the best postgraduate evangelical training in such areas. If we find an un-biblical anti-intellectualism inherent in our churches (despite our penchant for academic degrees and titles), we must renounce it. God’s wisdom comes from the Spirit revealing the mind of Christ. Finely trained minds are the outworking of the gift of spiritual discernment. Workers need to have discernment concerning the leading of the Spirit. They need to know how to use spiritual gifts in confrontations with the demonic, in healing the sick, in prophecy, through a (supernatural) word of discernment, through a word of knowledge, or through the interpretation of dreams. The missionary needs to be a person of balance—sound in theology, bold and authoritative, but meek and flexible; able to exercise spiritual gifts and power, but not extremist; fully developing his academic capacities, but deeply spiritual and pragmatic. Urban workers need to be able to grapple with the concepts of the Scriptures. They will not teach using books and concepts, but like their Master, using story and parable. The ability to tell stories grows out of a full life, marked by a fine sensitivity—an ability to feel what others around you are feeling. The urban missionary must be a leader in the midst of the people, able to incarnate a people’s soul, speak their poetry, and understand their aspirations. This is the gift of cross-cultural communication. It requires strength of will on the inside, an inner fiber coupled with above-average sensitivity, flexibility, and adaptability. It involves a capacity for suspended judgment—being able to hold two opposing views in one’s mind without feeling buried by tension. The black-and-white absolutist or judgmental thinker is not a natural missionary. Above all, urban missionaries need to be men and women of the word of God. A layperson can do an in-depth study of all the scriptures over five or six years, and memorize several hundred passages that will transform thought patterns. The main goal of studying the Bible is to know, love, and understand Jesus. The values and actions he talks about in the Sermon on the Mount will best prepare us to cross cultures. Perhaps memorizing that sermon is the place to begin. Missionary school
Along with theological and
vocational education, training for such a man or woman is along the lines of the
training Jesus gave the disciples—spending time with alcoholics, rescuing
lesbians and homosexuals, walking for months with the drug addict, explaining
the gospel to abusive students, living among the poorest immigrant community,
healing prejudice, and visiting prisoners. The more difficult the sufferings
encountered in our comfortable Western society, the better equipped the
missionary will be. Learning to work under authority is important. Only those with the power of submission, those able to trust others with decisions about their lives will survive the tensions of a mission community. Such lessons must be learned before reaching the field.
Potential missionaries should be
taught to live without possessions (except books, since these contribute to
wisdom and tools of the trade). They should learn to eat little meat and few
desserts, to know how to keep their bodies healthy through wise diet, natural
foods, the use of herbs and good exercise. They should practice living in
crowded conditions and coping with constant pressures. Francis Xavier was insistent on tested men for the mission field. He suggested the following tests for potential missionaries: The spiritual exercises will be made for a month, in order to judge the nature of the individual, his steadfastness, temperament, inclinations and vocation. For another month, he will serve the poor in the hospitals in every kind of menial work he might be ordered to perform, because to humble oneself in all meekness and care nothing for the esteem of the world is to set at naught human respect. During the third month, he must make a pilgrimage on foot and without money, placing his entire hope in the Creator and Lord, accustoming himself to bad food and a comfortless bed. He who cannot either rest or travel without food and with poor sleep for twenty-four hours will be unable, we believe, to persevere in the Society.1 It was not enough to Xavier that we have spiritual yearnings and romantic dreams. We need to pass tough tests before qualifying as workers among the poor. The harvest is urgent, but God takes time to train his harvesters. Sacrifice
The call is costly in terms of
family relationships, separation from children and health. “How lonesome the
weary hours confined to my room,” wrote Hudson Taylor upon the death of his
wife. “How I missed my dear wife and the little pattering footsteps of the
children far away in England.” While God never calls us to desert our family
responsibilities, he may, for a limited season, call us to sever those links. Kagawa wrote this poem to his wife:
You who dwell
But I have nothing
To give to you. You have married Poverty, sorrow; Bear it with me; The storm will be over Tomorrow. A little while
For us His wife Haru had not only married a man who would always be wandering—she had married a life of poverty and sorrow. For many, work in the slums is a call to celibacy; for others, a life of singleness for some years. This call to singleness is not a call to individualism, but to involvement in a community. Singleness in the ancient orders involved vows of chastity. A commitment to chastity, or purity of heart, is contrary to all the tendencies of nature. But chosen singleness is not a breaking of human affections. It is given that we might love our neighbor more fully. Singleness is a calling in God’s economy, enabling people to more deeply know their Lord. Many people give their early years to the pursuit of love—we must give it to the pursuit of God.
A poor man Jesus did not rebuke him. His reply was: There is no one who has left house or brothers and sisters or mother or father or children or lands for my sake and for the gospel, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions and, in the age to come, eternal life (Mark 10:28–30). The movement Behind such a mission thrust of poor, wise men and women, we need a movement of hundreds of men and women in the sending base. These “senders” choose another sort of poverty—that of simplicity.
This is the commitment of my home
church. They send and support almost thirty missionaries. The means of
supporting these laborers? Simplicity! These are ordinary men and women, “living simply that others may simply live,” living frugally that missionaries may continue spreading the kingdom, living without to win the fight against the demon of materialism that controls our nations. They live out their simplicity communally with other believers to battle the twin brother of materialism— excessive individualism. It has destroyed not only our society, but also our nuclear family structures. It is the cause of the new poverty of the urban West. How can we live communally? In New Zealand, the most effective communal structure has been the house group, a weekly meeting of six to fifteen people learning to mold their lives together as “family,” seeking to hear God’s direction, worshipping, and studying the word together. Members struggle together with the social and economic implications of the kingdom. Sharing money, recreation, garden tools, meals, vehicles, and ministry all have emerged as natural outcomes.
Some have added semi-detached
quarters to their home for a solo mother, widow, or single young folk. Others
have obtained three or four houses close to each other in the same street to
share the load of hospitality, child supervision, and possessions. Servants of the Lord Seventy of us were gathered in prayer, worshipping God. Seven had just been commissioned to Asia’s slums. Others had committed themselves to training in preparation to go. As we sang together, a picture of the Lord came to mind.
He came from Mount Zion on a
magnificent white charger, descending upon one of the great cities of Asia.
Millions of city-dwellers lined its streets, all worshipping God in song and
dance. There seemed to be no rich, no poor. Each one had a home. But all had
left their work and homes to worship the King. NOTES
1.
Xavier Leon Du Jour, S.J., St. Francis Xavier, pp.65,66 — trans. 2. Toyohiko Kagawa, “The Cross of the Whole Christ,” in Meditations on the Cross. SCM, 1936. |
|